Skip to main content

Working Methods Resolution is adopted!

'It could have been stronger, but it’s not bad’

This morning at 1am, a round of applause and some cheers erupted from one of the rooms in the UN Headquarters: the resolution on Working Methods for CSW had been adopted. Together with approximately 30 civil society representatives we have been waiting, supporting our delegates and lobbying from the other side of the door of the negotiation room.

Up to 10pm last night, the positions of countries could not have been further apart. It seemed very unlikely that any agreement would be reached on the 25 paragraphs in the resolution that still needed to be discussed. A few countries were holding firm on opposing references to three key issues for us as civil society: Human Rights, gender equality and participation of civil society. With the other countries holding firm on the inclusion of these three issues, a compromise seemed not in sight. Until… a break was proposed by the Swiss moderator. And with increased pressure to adopt the resolution before this morning it was just 3 hours later that a very tired but relieved bunch of people left the negotiation room.

So what is the harvest?

Overall, the general feeling amongst civil society is that it could have been stronger on several issues that we have been pushing for, but that in general it is not bad. Looking at the previous Working Methods from 2006, we have made some small steps forward.

Positive is the mentioning of Human Rights in several parts, which means they are recognized as a framework that runs through the CSW, rather than it being just one critical area of the Beijing agenda. Also, there is a mechanism adopted that reviews the implementation of past Agreed Conclusions of the CSW, which is new to the Working Methods. And although the norm-setting role of CSW has not made it into the Working Methods, a paragraph that restricted UNWomen’s mandate to only the CSW has been removed.

On the other hand there is some disappointment on how civil society participation has made it into the final Working Methods. Our participation is captured in several places in the document. Summarizing: it officially affirms the space that civil society has had in CSW. Deliver statements and take place in panels. Which is positive in the way that it ‘holds the line’ in a world where civil society is suffering from a shrinking political space. But the disappointment is about how we had pushed for more participation and our voice to be heard in the negotiations. Unfortunately, our inclusion in interactive dialogues are now fixed in the Working Methods with the reference ‘at the end of the general discussion’. Which is a bit late in the day (or in Dutch: mosterd na de maaltijd).

Also disappointing is that gender equality has been mentioned throughout, except for one strongly debated paragraph. A paragraph about emerging issues (such as climate change, violent extremisms, etc.). The eventual phrase that is being used is ‘equality between women and men’. This is disappointing as CSW’s core business is achieving gender equality and empowerment of women and girls.

To close on a positive note: there are quite strong references to the Post-2015 Agenda. Though references to the SDGs have not made it. A new final paragraph was even added yesterday evening that states that the Commission should review its Working Methods next year, to align them with the Post-2015 Development Agenda. This agenda will be adopted in September this year.

And… no reference is made as to when the final document of CSW should be adopted. Once and for all: the home for negotiations is the two weeks of the duration of CSW. Not the weeks before. Just so that we’re clear on that…!
 
=Sanne Holtslag on behalf of WO=MEN Dutch Gender Platform= 

Comments

loeky droesen said…
dank voor alle updates, groet loeky droesen

Popular posts from this blog

The CSW68 is a wrap!

  Met Nederlands ambassadeur en CSW Facilitator Yoka Brandt op de foto na afloop van de CSW68 “We have reservations on the text. We don’t have instructions to proceed to adoption .” After seven days of negotiations at the UN during this year’s Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), Nigeria almost blocked the negotiated outcome document from being adopted. Almost, because after some formal and informal interventions in Conference Room 4, the Nigerian delegate, flanked by the Dutch Ambassador Yoka Brandt, added: “I now have instructions to support the adoption.” On the balcony filled with civil society as well as in the plenary room there was a clear sigh of relief followed by enthusiastic applause, hugging and photo taking. We have Agreed Conclusions ! Early negotiations As usual, the CSW negotiations process started early February with a Zero Draft , developed by UN Women and the CSW Bureau. And with input and inspiration taken from the Secretary General Report. For the EU, as

CSW68 Youth Dialogue statement by Fenna Timsi

  Dutch youth representative Fenna Timsi gives her statement in the CSW68 Youth Dialogue On Thursday afternoon, 14 March 2024, the Dutch youth representative Fenna Timsi gave her statement in the CSW68 Youth Dialogue inside the UN. The reflections from several participants of this year's Youth Dialogue - the second ever as part of the CSW - were that it has much improved compared to last year. Importantly, many more of the people who were given the floor were actually young people themselves. Many of the statements were rich and relevant in content with clear and important messages for the government delegates in the other room in the UN who had started the negotiations for the outcome document. Read Fenna's statement below or see the full Youth Dialogue here (Fenna's statement is at 1:20:10). Dear all,   As the Dutch UN Youth Representative, I thank you to speak independently on behalf of young people in the Netherlands, not on behalf of the government. I spoke to many yo

Blog #4 by Sanne: We need progress on Loss & Damage!

Today the CSW’s main outcome document, the Agreed Conclusions, continued. At this CSW66, it is not only essential that we move forward on gender equality issues, but also on climate, environmental and disaster-risk reduction action! We need to connect to existing discussions in different UN-spaces to ensure that our discussions here in New York strengthen our intersectional, transformative climate action and that gender equality is central. Because we want this CSW to ensure that we deal with environmental & climate crises as coherently and strongly as possible. We can’t wait any longer!